decision time for caps’ leonsis, mcphee

(photo by Brian Murphy)

While it might have been simply unfathomable heading into the second round of the Stanley Cup playoffs, the Washington Capitals’ season has shockingly come to an abrupt halt.

After dispatching the New York Rangers in just five games and earning a week’s vacation while the rest of the Eastern Conference teams took turns beating each other into submission, the Caps failed to use the time off to their advantage.

The Tampa Bay Lightning showed up after outlasting the Pittsburgh Penguins in a grueling seven-game series against and, yet, from the moment the puck dropped, they looked like the hungrier team. They looked like the more determined team. The Bolts looked like the team that refused to accept defeat.

So here we are – just four games later – suddenly trying to figure out what went wrong with the 2010-11 Capitals. More importantly though, it’s now time to figure out where does this team go from here.

Think back to when it all began. Think back to the 2003-04 season when Capitals owner Ted Leonsis and his general manager, George McPhee, took a good, hard look at their team and came to the gutsy decision to blow it up and start over.

By their own admission, Leonsis and McPhee saw a talented team that was good enough to make the playoffs each year, but was rarely a threat to do anything once the postseason began.

These gentlemen refused to accept mediocrity, so they traded away a bunch of veterans to stockpile young prospects and draft picks while bracing for a painful rebuilding process. Sure, there were countless bumps and bruises along the way, but the move paid off.

Thanks to the decision to embrace a full-fledged rebuild, the Caps were in a position to land a franchise cornerstone like Alex Ovechkin. And Nicklas Backstrom. And Alexander Semin. And Mike Green. And so on.

In November 2007, Bruce Boudreau was named the interim coach of the Caps. After winning one Calder Cup championship with Washington’s minor league affiliate, the Hershey Bears, in ’06 and making it back to the finals in ’07, Boudreau earned the same call-up as his top-shelf talent.

Under Boudreau, a suddenly-motivated Caps team that had started the season 6-14-1, finished the year 37-17-7 and made the playoffs for the first time in five seasons.

In 2008, Boudreau took home the Jack Adams Award, as the NHL’s top coach.

And then the Washington finished the regular season as the Eastern Conference’s top seed.

This year, the Capitals earned their fourth-consecutive division title. All of which adds up to a regular season record of 189-79-39 (good enough for a .679 winning percentage, which is tops among active coaches).

But that’s only half the story.

Once the regular season concludes and the postseason begins, the Caps – for reasons that remain unclear – transform into a completely different animal.

A team that always finds a way to battle back and claim victory during the regular season suddenly has no room for error come playoff time.

A fearless team of high-skilled players with “no quit” sadly transforms into a roster of perennial underachievers who cannot handle any adversity whatsoever in a seven-game series.

A coach who wins 68 percent of the regular-season games he shows up for is just 17-20 in hockey’s most important season. Regular season accolades are enjoyable, but at some point those need to translate to the postseason.

At some point, “hot goalies” and “lucky bounces” are no longer deemed satisfactory explanations for your team’s shortcomings.

Losing four years in a row to a lesser seed in the early stages of the playoffs ain’t cutting it.

Simply put – winning two series in four years with a team universally viewed as one of the most talent-laden rosters in the sport is simply unacceptable.

A wise man once said, “If you’re not getting better, you’re getting worse.”

So where do we go from here?

During the early stages of the rebuild, Leonsis often spoke of a five-year plan for the Capitals. Well, Boudreau’s Caps have had four seasons together now and I’m not sure even the most optimistic of fans can say with 100 percent sincerity that this team has what it takes to win a championship.

Does that mean Boudreau should go?

In years past, top-tier guys like Green and Semin have wilted under the pressure and vanished in the postseason. This year Backstrom joined the club.

Does that mean the roster is in need of a radical overhaul?

These are the decisions Leonsis and McPhee are facing in the coming days. And really, if you think about it, they’re almost back to square one.

They’re looking at a team good enough to make the playoffs year in and year out, but a team that ultimately isn’t a threat to do anything once the postseason begins. Sure, the prominent players are younger, but the basics remain the same.

So now the brain trust must determine which course of action to take next. Do they believe that the talent is there, but the locker room is no longer on the same page as the coach?

If so, then Boudreau will be the fall guy.

Do they believe that the right coach is in place, but some are either unwilling or unable to do what it takes to win in the playoffs?

If so, guys like Green and Semin could find themselves in different area codes this time next year.

Whatever happens next, you can rest assured the answer is not “keep things status quo.”

Four years of failure is enough of a sample size to know that this team – with this combination of players and coaches – cannot get it done.

Patience is, in fact, a virtue. But we’re past that point. That ship has sailed.

For better or for worse, wholesale changes are coming. The team you see on opening night next season will in all likelihood be drastically different than the one you saw take to the ice last night.

And while we’ve all grown fond of these particular players and coaches, it’s for the best. The window doesn’t remain open forever.

Even a superstar like Alex Ovechkin isn’t always going to be a 100-point player. Typically, if you’re lucky, you’ve got five good seasons to make something happen.

Time is running out on these Capitals. Leonsis knows it. McPhee knows it. And the sooner you accept it, the sooner we can all accept it and move on.

We all keep telling ourselves there’s always next year, but honestly, that’s not always going to be the case.

[Update: Ted Leonsis addresses this subject on his blog today.]

Author Description

b murf

I'm a D.C. sports blogger, professional photographer and an eternal pessimist. All I want in life is for Al Iafrate to finally call and admit he's my father.

Comments

  1. May 5, 2011

    players like Ovechkin don’t retire without championships…

    let’s just hope that doesn’t happen in the Ray Bourque way.

    I’m sorry but Boudreau has got to go. In the end its all business and whether or not it is his fault, its still his fault. Whether he didn’t know what to tell the players to do, or whether he couldn’t motivate them to do it, the result is still the same.

  2. May 5, 2011

    The question is still the same about Boudreau. Who do you replace him with? Do you stick with him until someone comes along mid season? Do you grasp at someone off-season? Or do you give him “One more chance”? I do believe he’ll take the fall for this current short coming.

  3. May 5, 2011

    that same argument was made with Hanlon, there is always someone else.

  4. May 5, 2011

    OFB has sometimes floated Dale Hunter (co-owner/coach of OHL’s London Knights) as a possibility, that is IF the idea is you need a “culture change” and a more hard-nosed coach who’ll keep players accountable, and if you think a coach who’s never coached at the AHL or NHL level can make the leap. Hunter has expressed some general interest in the NHL for the right situation.

    A lot of teams hire former Cup winners in hopes of that rubbing off and it doesn’t often work. Hasn’t worked with Torts in NY, for example. Caps could bring in an abrasive type like Mike Keenan (who has a Cup but whose last few teams haven’t done much) and hope he works some short-term magic but he seems to wear out his welcome quickly most places. They could shove a pile of money under Scotty Bowman but he seems content in retirement.

    I’m still baffled by all the poor/botched line changes in this series.

  5. May 5, 2011

    Time to bring Scotty Bowman out of retirement!

  6. May 5, 2011

    Dale Hunter isn’t a bad idea…at least that series would have had some belligerence to it. This entire series was processed turkey on wonder-bread with extra mayonnaise.

    i think i’m hungry…

  7. May 5, 2011

    Bruce needs to learn how to beat the trap, then its all good.

  8. May 5, 2011

    Perhaps I am clinging too hard to old grudges, but seeing a Capitals bench with Scotty Bowman behind it would be utterly distasteful. Anyone that supports this idea is a 100 level nouveau Caps fan who cheers for Ovechkin whether he is on the ice or not. We would basically be taking the same path that the Red Sox took in turning into the Yankees. I’m thrilled that the Capitals are garnering new fans, but not these pink hat Sox fan types. As a Capitals fan literally since birth (the Colts left my hometown the day I was born, and thus hockey is the only sport I’ve ever cared about) I want a Cup more than anything. But not like that, not with Bowman. It would be Jagr all over again. That turned out great for us right?
    I think that Bruce is worth another shot (or half a shot at least). It would be amazing to see Huntsy behind the bench. No one has the answers, other than that Arturs Irbe deserves a raise.
    On a purely superstitious note, brining down the Attendance Champions banners was a good step, but obviously not enough. Let’s get 12 and 37 in the rafters where they belong. It would at least shift the balance so that more than half of the retired numbers are deserving. No disrespect meant to 7 or 11, but the former was a token retirement because we needed to retire somebody and the latter gave his best years to the Rags and is best remembered there.

  9. May 5, 2011

    What’s with the “Let’s give Bruce another half of a shot” mentality? Um, he’s fine in the regular season. So you give him half a season to be a successful, winning coach and then what? It would be the same thing as this year – keep him on board, finish out the regular season as a top seed and see it all fall apart again in the playoffs.

    If the cord is going to be cut, it will happen before the season starts. If he’s still here when the season starts, then you’ll probably be wondering where some of your favorite players have gone. (See: Laich, Brooks and Semin, Alexander)

  10. May 5, 2011

    no matter WHAT happens…can we all agree that keeping brooks laich is a top priority?

    http://www.nhlnumbers.com/teams/WAS?year=2011

    in related news thank you Messrs Arnott, Sturm, and Hannan here is a (mostly) gold watch and a bouquet of scented bath-oils, dontgethitintheassbythedoor.

  11. May 5, 2011

    I would LOVE to keep Brooksie! :) Mostly because his handsomeness is immeasurable.

  12. May 5, 2011

    thats certainly the word i would use to describe it

  13. May 6, 2011

    Paige, you misunderstood what I meant by half a chance. I should have explained that I was eluding not to giving him half a season, but to bringing outside help. Having a consultant come in to work with Bruce on the power play could make a huge difference with the team and how they can be more effectively coached by the winningest coach in the league.
    Obviously if he is going it will be before the season starts.
    I do, however, find a flawed logic in your and others assertions that coaching in the regular season is that much different that coaching in the playoffs. I think that a lot of the “fire Boudreau” vitriol is a stems from people being more comfortable criticizing the guy in the suit rather than the kids in the jerseys. If more of the kids in the sweaters had bought into the system in round two, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. Not yet at least. Guy Boucher isn’t a better coach than Bruce Boudreau just because his team got farther. His team got farther, not because his game plan was better, but because his kids stuck to it. Unfortunately that leaves us with a much harder problem to solve than “bad coach syndrome”.

  14. May 9, 2011

    I like that Paige is already using baby delivering terms in the comments!…and you forgot Brook’s ‘back muscles’ that cause blinking.

Leave a Reply