for redskins, it has to be robert griffin III

(photo by Sarah Glenn)

When it comes to the most important position on the biggest team in town, there is only one acceptable answer.

No, it’s not Peyton Manning. And for better or for worse, it’s not Andrew Luck either. At the end of the day, the player who has to be the face of the franchise for the Washington Redskins is Robert Griffin III.

Look, anyone familiar with my work knows I’ve been on the RGIII bandwagon for a while now. The way this young man carries himself on and off the football field has always impressed the hell out of me.

And as someone who spent two and a half years out of my life stationed at Fort Hood in the middle of nowhere Texas, I know where he came from and what he’s all about.

Having parents who both served in the U.S. Army has obviously helped Griffin to become a natural leader.

His teammates absolutely love everything about him and you’ll never have to worry about the 22-year-old getting his first big payday and letting the money go to his head or turning into some kind of raging ego case.

While every rookie comes with some risk, I continue to believe that Griffin is as close to a sure thing as you’re going to get these days.

As long as he ends up in the right system with a coaching staff that is willing and able to work with his skill set, I fully expect RGIII to become one of the most popular and marketable stars the NFL has to offer.

Wouldn’t it be nice for the Redskins to have a player like that?

That being said, I know that more than a few ‘Skins fans have concerns about Griffin. I know that not everyone is on board with the idea of acquiring the Heisman Trophy winner or the price tag that’s attached to moving up in the draft to land the Baylor standout.

With that in mind, I’ve decided to address some of the most common arguments I’ve heard by skeptical fans who are against Griffin landing in D.C.

The Redskins aren’t one player away. They simply have too many needs to mortgage their future for one player.

For better or worse, this will be the defining offseason of the Mike Shanahan era.

Sure, he’s a two-time Super Bowl winning coach and all, but the majority of his success came elsewhere* and his record in Washington is a lot closer to that of Jim Zorn and Steve Spurrier than it is to his golden years in Denver.

*A Redskins tradition during the Daniel Snyder era.

In his first season, Shanahan tried to win with an aging veteran. That experiment failed miserably.

In his second season, Shanahan opted to focus on other areas and go into the season with two of the least heralded quarterbacks the league had to offer.

The Redskins spent less on the quarterback position than any other team in football and you saw how well that worked out, right?

As Shanahan heads into the midpoint of his five-year contract, it’s time to address the quarterback position once and for all. Rather than embracing another past-his-prime quarterback or settling on the “best available,” why wouldn’t Shanahan go after the most electrifying player in this year’s draft?

Let me ask you a serious question – do you think the New York Giants regret for a second the decision to trade away multiple high draft picks for Eli Manning?

Sure, the Giants had to sacrifice to acquire their quarterback of choice, but two Super Bowl victories later it’s safe to say they’re not losing sleep over missing out on Shawne Merriman or whoever else New York would have selected in the 2005 draft.

I understand the sentiment of fans who saw the Redskins stockpile draft picks last offseason and want nothing more than another double-digit draft class, but there’s got to be a balance between quantity and quality.

Last year’s draft class helped to build some much-needed depth across the board. But at some point the Redskins have to do more than just collect rookies like baseball cards if they want to be competitive.

And most importantly, having the right quarterback can help elevate everyone else around him.

Teams like Green Bay and Pittsburgh give up a ton of sacks every year, but they’re always among the NFL’s elite because Aaron Rodgers and Ben Roethlisberger are two of the best in the business.

It doesn’t matter who lines up at receiver for New England or New Orleans because Tom Brady and Drew Brees can make anyone (other than Chad Ochocinco) productive.

The Redskins could have Vincent Jackson, Dwayne Bowe and the best offensive line in football, but it won’t matter if Rex Grossman is behind center.

Get a real quarterback, and everyone else around them becomes a little bit better.

If Griffin III is a bust, it’ll set the franchise back another five years or so.

Quarterback is easily the most important position on a football team. With an elite quarterback, anything is possible. Without one … well … let’s just say it’s an uphill battle that most franchises are unable to overcome.

Just look at the quarterbacks who have led their teams to a Super Bowl victory over the last decade – Eli Manning (twice), Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, Ben Roethlisberger (twice), Peyton Manning, Tom Brady (twice) and Brad Johnson.

With the exception of Johnson, who seems slightly out of place in this conversation, those are easily some of the biggest names in football.

And rather than regurgitating the laundry list of mediocre quarterbacks who have come and gone in Washington over the last decade or so, I’ll simply point out the following:

The last time the Redskins won the NFC East was in 1999.

In related news, the last time the Redskins had a Pro Bowl quarterback was Brad Johnson in 1999.

Prior to that, the Redskins last won their division in 1991.

It should come as no surprise that Washington had a Pro Bowl quarterback – Mark Rypien – that season as well.

If the Redskins are finally going to return to respectability, it’s going to have to start with improved play in the NFC East.

History shows, if that’s going to happen, it’s going to take a Pro Bowl performance from their quarterback.

Griffin’s frame and durability come into question because of his style of play.

As one local columnist wrote, “Running quarterbacks in the NFL wind up in two places: the ground and the injury list.”

And that’s true, to a certain extent. Philadelphia quarterback Mike Vick has amassed more than 5,200 rushing yards during his 10-year career, and yet, he’s only played in all 16 games of a season once.

So once again I understand why some local fans are concerned about investing so much into a player who might not be able to withstand the pounding that comes with consistently tucking the ball and running.

But RGIII isn’t Vick. In fact, he doesn’t even consider himself a running quarterback. Griffin is happy to call himself a pocket passer who has the ability to run with the football if need be.

Just because he has the ability to run a 4.41 40-yard dash doesn’t mean Griffin intends to take off any time his first target isn’t open.

He’s simply someone who uses his mobility to extend a play and buy his receivers more time when need be. Don’t believe me? Go back and watch this game-winning throw against No. 5 Oklahoma with eight seconds remaining.

Although the opportunity to take off running presented itself, Griffin never even considered it.

So while you might think he’s the next Mike Vick, just know that he doesn’t feel the same way.

Griffin played in a spread offense. NFL teams do not. Don’t you remember Colt Brennan?

Worry less about the gimmicky college football offense and focus more on the skill set of the player.

Ask yourself if he can do the things Shanahan demand of his quarterback. The Redskins run a ton of bootlegs and rollouts. They like to challenge defenses by taking shots downfield. They don’t want a quarterback who is careless with the football. Strong work ethic is an absolute must.

That, my friends, is everything Griffin brings to the table.

And while many fans don’t know this, Baylor center Philip Blake is on record as saying that he and Griffin stayed after practice every day so the quarterback could get used to taking snaps from under center.

Griffin knew he wasn’t going to play out of the shotgun in the NFL, so he began preparing himself for the transition to the next level a year ago.

Typical Redskins, chasing big names in hopes of selling jerseys.

Former Redskins safety Matt Bowen, who now writes for the National Football Post and who I have a great deal of respect for, brought up a great point that I feel applies to this topic:

“Thinking like a coach, the opportunity to develop a player like Griffin from day one doesn’t come around too often. From footwork, to mechanics and techniques (in and outside of the pocket), you get to work with a top tier talent in the meeting room and on the field.”

Doesn’t that sound more appealing than trying to figure out if Mike and Kyle Shanahan are willing and able to get out of the way and let Manning do his thing?

Why not build up the offensive line and receiving corps this year and then go all-in for USC’s Matt Barkley next year?

Stop it.

Anyone legitimately suggesting this as an option is a complete moron.

For starters, if the Redskins are able to upgrade the rest of the offense, then chances are they’re not going to have a pick in the top six of next year’s draft.*

*And if they do, then Shanahan might not actually be around this time next year.

Let’s say Barkley plays as well as expected for USC next season. If that’s the case there’s a very real chance he could be the top pick in the 2013 draft.

If you think the price tag is high right now, just imagine trying how much more the front office would have to ship away if they A.) had to trade up higher and 2.) held a pick somewhere in the middle of the first round as opposed to the sixth overall spot they occupy now.

Plus, if that’s your plan you’re essentially wasting away another season in Washington while hoping the owner doesn’t get fed up as the losses continue to pile up and you’re praying Barkley or whoever remains healthy and productive.

That sure does seem like a lot of variables for a player who might very well end up in the same situation Luck finds himself in right now – the sure-fire top pick who Indianapolis has no desire to pass up.

Like I said earlier, this is the defining offseason for the Shanahan era in Washington. He doesn’t have the luxury of going cheap on quarterback for another season and waiting for Barkley or whoever else down the road.

The time is now and the player who is best suited to lead this franchise back down the road to respectability is there for the taking. After putting Baylor football on the map, he’s clearly qualified.

The only question remaining is – will the front office seize this opportunity and go all in on the one player who can save this sinking ship or are Redskins fans destined for another decade of mediocrity?

One way or the other, we’re about to find out.


  1. Eric
    March 6, 2012 at 10:19 am

    Well, I think the one thing we all learned recently is that no matter how hard times may be, no deal is better than a bad deal. Am I right? So, if rg3 doesn’t want part of the redskins, let him go. McPhee will lead the team to victory rg3 or not.

  2. M R F
    March 6, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    That is some compelling stuff. I am afraid of the Redskins drafting RGIII because nothing…NOTHING….they have done in the last 10+ years has worked and if this were to end up as an epic and expensive failure there would be nowhere else to go. This is the all in move and if it fails I have to move to Toronto and root for the Argonauts.

  3. Krol2
    March 6, 2012 at 4:33 pm

    As a Browns fan it all sounds good to me. Washington should do all they can to get him. Cleveland probably will too even though they should go after Trent Richardson and anotehr playmaker at No. 22. RG3 would be fun to watch in Cleveland, but Washington is closer to being a more sturdy team. Cleveland needs a high-power running back to function in the AFC North. Washington has two great RB’s.

  4. ExKiwi Krol
    March 6, 2012 at 6:27 pm

    Screw the Argonauts, the Saskatchewan Roughriders is where is at, yo.

    The Skins have the best change unless Cleveland throws in pick #22, which they are not. So……

    Either way, in 5 years no one will miss the picks whoever trades to grab him because he’ll be that damn good and intelligent. And he is not from the Newport News/Norfolk area. I’m typing at you Mr. Vick.

  5. ball sack johnson
    March 6, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    well I got bad news for you there, bmurf. because your whole tediously long diatribe will be moot soon enough. as I was listening to Randy cross on the radio today, the browns are purposely holding out currently, the story of them not wanting to give up their second first rounder is untrue, and in fact they are more interested in griffin than Washington is and are prepared to “blow any teams offer out of the water come draft day”.

    also was mentioned that the rams will deal wash if they have to but they really want to deal with cleveland. when asked where is griffin going……he said, there is no question at all….cleveland.

    when asked what Washington will do he said he did expect them to draft tannehill at #6. so u can write this article….just switch it to tannehill. you should start studying him.

  6. smiley4284
    March 6, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    RGIII in the same sentence as Colt Brennan? Yikes…despite the spread offense comparisons, Colt was a small, frail, side-armed QB who played JV-level competition in college who was set to fail in the NFL from day 1. Plus he had an aura of entitlement and laziness about him and he never worked hard. Colt was even called a douche by a scout at the Senior Bowl and combine due to his interview attitude.

    RGIII is the EXACT opposite of the above.

    RGIII….I’m all in!

  7. L Vader
    March 7, 2012 at 7:20 am

    I understand and agree with your assessment. However, my concern is a player’s ability to fit and operate in the current coaching strategy/philosophy. The question becomes do you change your coaching strategy to fit the player or vice versa. Great coaches are able to make the adjustment based on the team character. Ask Coach K. Whether in pros or college it’s all about making the puzzle pieces fit. I don’t think the coaching staff can make this work.

  8. Joel
    March 7, 2012 at 8:52 am

    The one thing that concerns me about getting RG3 is what to do once you have him.

    If you trade away a bunch of picks to get him, then you aren’t able to upgrade your receiving core or offensive line. Plus, as good as he is, he has to adjust to a new system and life in the pros.

    So essentially, you either need to still start Rex Grossman or another QB at the beginning of the year or you have to throw RG3 to the wolves with suspect weapons around him at the beginning of the year.

    I’m not saying that can’t work, it just still gives me pause. Maybe they can get RG3 and a veteran to come in and start week one, but otherwise I’m concerned for RG3’s future if he comes to Washington.

  9. AshDonatella
    March 7, 2012 at 9:17 am

    Go big or go home. Plain and simple from someone whose favorite team is not the Redskins but does have season tickets, it’s time to see a team that is going to make better decisions. It’s so hard to sit back and watch the Redskins get beat over and over again and head home with a husband who is upset after having much higher hopes for the team the last few seasons. It’s time for them to get real and make that leap if they have any intentions of being a better team all around this season. Parking lots grew more scarce towards the end of last season; even when the tickets are sold to season ticket holders, management should be worried about the fact that people are giving tickets away for free or just not attending games at all. It may not be directly affecting them today but in the next year or two people are going to start spending their money elsewhere which will have a huge impact on the team. It’s time to get what they need and it’s easy to see that they need a qualified quarterback.

  10. michelle
    March 7, 2012 at 9:30 am

    the only certainty is that if the skins keep doing what they’ve been doing they’ll keep getting what they got. if we don’t start taking some BOLD risks we will continue to be on the fringe and not in the game. sadly, we cannot do anything to oust the owner and the bad karma he brings with him, but we can spend as much of his money as it takes to have a fighting chance.

  11. Rich
    March 7, 2012 at 4:01 pm

    People love to quote Eli but he took at least 3 seasons before people started believing in him/he started producing the kind of performances that can carry a team.

    You say the Skins have to move now so that Shanahan will be retained – it is just as likely RGIII will take Eli’s path of development as it is he will produce like Newton or Dalton in his first year.

    Also remember the Jets went up and got Sanchez and he has been a net drag. So just because Eli is flavour of the month doesn’t make it a slam dunk that trading the farm for a QB is the smart move.

    The ‘all in’ move is to pick up Manning, get an impact FA WR, trade down in the 1st and grab Tannehill, then use the extra picks to add further quality and depth to the lines.

    Trading the farm to pick up RGIII is putting all your eggs in one basket. It could turn out to be Eli/Newton (even then you’re looking at at least a few years before the investment brings true desired results), or it could be Sanchez.

  12. Jay
    March 9, 2012 at 11:14 pm

    The Redskins haven’t drafted a “franchise quarterback” since Sammy Baugh. And their recent history of drafting quarterbacks is far from stellar. History shows that the Redskins have won with great offensive lines and running games and better than average receivers. If you want to follow the Redskins winning formula, then draft the best two available offensive linemen in rounds 1 and 2 and follow that up with the best available quarterback in round 3.

  13. Glenn X
    March 12, 2012 at 5:07 am

    ball sack johnson, I guess CBS’s Randy Cross is no Miss Cleo, eh? Or, rather, considering how her career as a psychic turned out, maybe he is. LMAO!

Leave a Reply

HomerMcFanboy background image